Total Conservation Programs in Jefferson County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,768
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Jefferson County, Iowa totaled $111,207,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Fry Farm | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $245,335 |
102 | Larry Pacha | Oxford, IA 52322 | $242,270 |
103 | Sandra Clingan | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $242,054 |
104 | Lois Lavon Hostetler | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $241,008 |
105 | William Helmick | Eldon, IA 52554 | $239,494 |
106 | Jeffrey Drish | Lone Tree, IA 52755 | $233,648 |
107 | Hazel Belle Baker | Birmingham, IA 52535 | $233,066 |
108 | Dennis A Drish | Washington, IA 52353 | $231,607 |
109 | Curtis P Pacha | Brighton, IA 52540 | $231,423 |
110 | The Hoskins Farm Corporation | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $231,093 |
111 | Ruth R Dodds | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $229,139 |
112 | Grimes Family Trust | Sun City, AZ 85351 | $229,018 |
113 | Wesley Shafer | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $226,671 |
114 | H & H Express | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $225,880 |
115 | Susan E Kientz | Brighton, IA 52540 | $225,439 |
116 | Darlene G Lauder | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $225,228 |
117 | G Bruce Simmons | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $224,572 |
118 | B & P Investments LLC | Chase, MI 49623 | $224,354 |
119 | Ron Baldosier | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $223,766 |
120 | Harold Smith | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $223,704 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”