Conservation Reserve Program in Jefferson County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 534
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Jefferson County, Iowa totaled $5,110,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Mary Lu Paul | Brighton, IA 52540 | $11,184 |
162 | Richard Paul | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $11,148 |
163 | Douglas Crawford | Birmingham, IA 52535 | $11,145 |
164 | Billingsley Sisters LLC | Lockridge, IA 52635 | $11,114 |
165 | Tony Fritz | Brighton, IA 52540 | $11,033 |
166 | J & B Farms Inc | Richland, IA 52585 | $10,912 |
167 | Merle Clark | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $10,868 |
168 | Ruth Eileen Pickard | Batavia, IA 52533 | $10,839 |
169 | Adam Ledger | Brighton, IA 52540 | $10,706 |
170 | Thomas A Adam | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $10,588 |
171 | Kathleen M Clough | St Joseph, MO 64505 | $10,558 |
172 | Floy Letitia Stutzman Revocable Trust Letitia Stut | Lockridge, IA 52635 | $10,454 |
173 | Dorian Atwood | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $10,449 |
174 | Robert Martin | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $10,426 |
175 | Michael L Laux | Keosauqua, IA 52565 | $10,355 |
176 | Mark F Pacha | Omaha, NE 68164 | $10,329 |
177 | Deerwood Hills LLC | Eldridge, IA 52748 | $10,302 |
178 | Connie Bryant | North Liberty, IA 52317 | $10,281 |
179 | Anna Ruth Hammes | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $10,179 |
180 | Nelco Farms Inc | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $10,177 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”