SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Jefferson County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 219
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Jefferson County, Iowa totaled $7,963,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Howard R Adrian Jr | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $92,464 |
22 | Douglas Crawford | Birmingham, IA 52535 | $91,412 |
23 | Brent Hoskins | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $89,721 |
24 | Patrick Lawrence Hammes | Batavia, IA 52533 | $87,746 |
25 | James Daniel Kaska | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $82,914 |
26 | Jeffrey M Fritz | Brighton, IA 52540 | $82,654 |
27 | Roy Eugene Anderson | Brighton, IA 52540 | $75,882 |
28 | Brushy Bend Inc | Richland, IA 52585 | $75,037 |
29 | Steven Dallner | Batavia, IA 52533 | $72,905 |
30 | Douglas Ray Adam | Hedrick, IA 52563 | $69,700 |
31 | Marvin Joseph Adam | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $67,341 |
32 | 3 L Farms | Brighton, IA 52540 | $67,219 |
33 | Tracy Ann Hammes | Batavia, IA 52533 | $65,644 |
34 | Jerry Daniel Main | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $60,155 |
35 | Rick L Sobaski | Packwood, IA 52580 | $59,702 |
36 | Iowa Family Farms | Batavia, IA 52533 | $58,445 |
37 | Robert Kaska | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $57,554 |
38 | Kaska Farm Corporation | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $57,528 |
39 | James C Flinspach | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $57,196 |
40 | Adam Industries | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $56,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”