Total Conservation Programs in Keokuk County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,078
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Keokuk County, Iowa totaled $160,669,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eugene Vogel | Hedrick, IA 52563 | $650,317 |
22 | Michael A Heisdorffer | Harper, IA 52231 | $637,987 |
23 | Chester W Render | South English, IA 52335 | $606,015 |
24 | Dennis Schmidt | Mason City, IA 50401 | $605,762 |
25 | Charlie Williams | Kalona, IA 52247 | $604,418 |
26 | Lonnie Lee Stein | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $589,867 |
27 | Kenneth Heisdorffer | Delta, IA 52550 | $578,788 |
28 | Rocky B Hiemstra | Cedar Rapids, IA 52411 | $576,106 |
29 | Lynda R Krueger | Ollie, IA 52576 | $575,499 |
30 | Regis L Arp | Fairfax, IA 52228 | $570,230 |
31 | Eric Reed | Williamsburg, IA 52361 | $566,650 |
32 | Roger Fritchen | Sigourney, IA 52591 | $561,591 |
33 | Dennis Hinshaw | Richland, IA 52585 | $561,262 |
34 | Kevin Joseph Hammes | Ollie, IA 52576 | $557,984 |
35 | Dean J Horras | Sigourney, IA 52591 | $557,695 |
36 | John P Tolerton | Bluffton, SC 29910 | $544,376 |
37 | Gary R Wagamon | Hedrick, IA 52563 | $537,361 |
38 | Oral Dean Dyson | Harper, IA 52231 | $533,971 |
39 | Daniel R Reed | South English, IA 52335 | $529,583 |
40 | Harold L Knowler | Delta, IA 52550 | $522,395 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”