Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kossuth County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,182
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $9,885,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dale J Lappe | Wesley, IA 50483 | $26,391 |
62 | Ryan Scott Farland | Swea City, IA 50590 | $26,257 |
63 | Steven Lofstrom | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $25,994 |
64 | Iway Inc | Lone Rock, IA 50559 | $25,993 |
65 | Ths Inc | Fenton, IA 50539 | $25,930 |
66 | Donald Leroy Bristow | Algona, IA 50511 | $25,783 |
67 | Jeff Frideres Farms Inc | Humboldt, IA 50548 | $25,501 |
68 | Jamie Frideres Farms Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $25,501 |
69 | Nicholaus Frideres Corp | Algona, IA 50511 | $25,501 |
70 | Mf Farms Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $25,501 |
71 | Dick Kuecker & Sons | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $25,434 |
72 | Schutjer Brothers Ltd | Wesley, IA 50483 | $25,126 |
73 | Lewis Francis Rolling | Swea City, IA 50590 | $25,019 |
74 | Capesius M Farms Ltd | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $24,951 |
75 | Steven Michael Berte | Lakota, IA 50451 | $24,820 |
76 | William A Lofstrom | Lakota, IA 50451 | $24,724 |
77 | Derrick F Bauer | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $24,620 |
78 | Bb Farms Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $24,368 |
79 | Mabus Farms Ltd | Lakota, IA 50451 | $24,000 |
80 | Gregory S Schupbach | Ottosen, IA 50570 | $23,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”