Total Conservation Programs in Kossuth County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,022
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $8,752,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Miller Family Living Trust Dtd April 6, 1993 | Cherokee, IA 51012 | $22,700 |
122 | Donald G Mc Gregor | Swea City, IA 50590 | $22,534 |
123 | Clarence W Mc Gregor | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $22,534 |
124 | Lois Mc Gregor | Minneapolis, MN 55421 | $22,278 |
125 | Phyllis Alger | Estherville, IA 51334 | $22,278 |
126 | C & I Mc Gregor Farms Corp | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $22,264 |
127 | Matthew Mc Gregor | Ames, IA 50010 | $22,263 |
128 | Christopher Mc Gregor | Peoria, IL 61604 | $22,263 |
129 | Wrg Farms LLC | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $22,247 |
130 | Laure A Kent | Algona, IA 50511 | $22,061 |
131 | Philip A Bernhard Trust | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $21,902 |
132 | Robert J Schmitt | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $21,757 |
133 | Alan And Jill Witt Revocable Trust - Alan Witt | Osage, IA 50461 | $21,282 |
134 | Arden Duane Haas | Lakota, IA 50451 | $21,025 |
135 | Jordon Wayne Grimm | West Bend, IA 50597 | $20,957 |
136 | Dee Ann Jensen Bierstedt | Fenton, IA 50539 | $20,950 |
137 | Hanselman 5 LLC | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $20,896 |
138 | Philip R Lampe | Burt, IA 50522 | $20,892 |
139 | Ronald E Monson | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $20,777 |
140 | Shane Frideres | Algona, IA 50511 | $20,602 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”