Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Kossuth County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 411
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $9,100,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Terry Wayne Weisbrod | Lone Rock, IA 50559 | $20,675 |
142 | Keith Kohlhaas | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $20,500 |
143 | Terry Kohlhaas | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $20,500 |
144 | Sylvester M Berte | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $20,148 |
145 | Jordon Wayne Grimm | West Bend, IA 50597 | $20,104 |
146 | Mary Celeste Goche | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $20,097 |
147 | James Philip Heldorfer | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $19,936 |
148 | Brandt Acres Ltd | Ledyard, IA 50556 | $19,905 |
149 | Gmb Farms Inc | Ledyard, IA 50556 | $19,901 |
150 | Allen L Ludwig | Corwith, IA 50430 | $19,614 |
151 | Roberta Hardt | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $19,505 |
152 | Ronald E Aukes | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $19,258 |
153 | James M Bauer | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $19,247 |
154 | Douglas B Tigges | Woodbury, MN 55129 | $19,132 |
155 | Gregory S Schupbach | Ottosen, IA 50570 | $19,104 |
156 | John James Fehr | West Bend, IA 50597 | $19,033 |
157 | Kent Elmer Fehr | Ottosen, IA 50570 | $19,033 |
158 | Karl Dean Fehr | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $19,033 |
159 | Mark Alan Fehr | West Bend, IA 50597 | $19,033 |
160 | Clarence Henry Casey | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $18,838 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”