Farm Subsidy information
Kossuth County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Kossuth County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,755
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $902,166,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ingalls Honey Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $3,389,007 |
2 | Charles Laubenthal | Swea City, IA 50590 | $2,177,740 |
3 | Richard C Simpson Living Trust | Algona, IA 50511 | $2,110,967 |
4 | Capesius Brothers Inc | Bode, IA 50519 | $2,059,919 |
5 | Pork Elite Llp | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,938,946 |
6 | Iway Inc | Lone Rock, IA 50559 | $1,795,628 |
7 | Seneka Inc | Fenton, IA 50539 | $1,777,440 |
8 | Gary Donald Lickteig | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,755,371 |
9 | Cher Pork LLC | Lone Rock, IA 50559 | $1,753,441 |
10 | Mawdsley Farms Inc | Burt, IA 50522 | $1,741,600 |
11 | Eldon Marlyn Beenken | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $1,719,235 |
12 | Roger A Cherland | Lone Rock, IA 50559 | $1,705,061 |
13 | William W Lindgren | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,702,154 |
14 | Lji Honey And Pollination | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $1,701,586 |
15 | Daniel Wayne Beenken | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $1,697,213 |
16 | Ruth Lindgren | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,690,042 |
17 | Stephen Rae Madden | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $1,678,604 |
18 | William Fredrick Walstead | Swea City, IA 50590 | $1,676,744 |
19 | Kenneth Michael Laubenthal | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $1,580,738 |
20 | Mark Ferstl | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,566,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>