Farm Subsidy information
Kossuth County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Kossuth County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,251
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $29,474,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ingalls Honey Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $583,599 |
2 | Charles Laubenthal | Swea City, IA 50590 | $252,023 |
3 | Jacob William Ingalls | Titonka, IA 50480 | $250,000 |
4 | Bollig Brothers | Fenton, IA 50539 | $197,325 |
5 | Vaske Bros Lc | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $191,754 |
6 | Pork Elite Llp | Algona, IA 50511 | $188,946 |
7 | Lji Honey And Pollination | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $172,035 |
8 | Mark Anthony Bollig | Algona, IA 50511 | $125,516 |
9 | North Timber, Llp | Algona, IA 50511 | $92,988 |
10 | Kyle W Rolling | Swea City, IA 50590 | $82,741 |
11 | Jordon Wayne Grimm | West Bend, IA 50597 | $80,156 |
12 | Craig Cink | Algona, IA 50511 | $76,829 |
13 | Steven Michael Berte | Lakota, IA 50451 | $76,696 |
14 | Michael James Kahler | Titonka, IA 50480 | $73,606 |
15 | Kenneth Michael Laubenthal | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $73,239 |
16 | Philip E Heldorfer | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $69,904 |
17 | Bollig Farms Inc | Fenton, IA 50539 | $69,854 |
18 | Farm Credit Services Of America ** | Lawton, IA 51030 | $65,883 |
19 | William Fredrick Walstead | Swea City, IA 50590 | $63,480 |
20 | Lyndon Louis Johnson | Swea City, IA 50590 | $63,439 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>