Counter Cyclical Program in Kossuth County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,886
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $24,044,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Rodney L Jensen | Algona, IA 50511 | $57,027 |
42 | Michael Jon Altman | Algona, IA 50511 | $56,708 |
43 | Duane Charles Boehm | Lakota, IA 50451 | $56,497 |
44 | Dale Louis Price | Lakota, IA 50451 | $56,042 |
45 | Heidecker Farms Inc | Lakota, IA 50451 | $55,967 |
46 | Union Farms Partnership | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $55,159 |
47 | Beam Grain Co | Lakota, IA 50451 | $55,112 |
48 | Rodney Bierle | Fenton, IA 50539 | $54,753 |
49 | Mabus Farms Ltd | Lakota, IA 50451 | $54,650 |
50 | Dennis A Marty Rev Trust | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $54,168 |
51 | Dean Grandgenett | Algona, IA 50511 | $53,357 |
52 | Leon K Farrow | Ledyard, IA 50556 | $53,020 |
53 | Alan Andrew Laubenthal | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $52,775 |
54 | Seneka Inc | Fenton, IA 50539 | $52,465 |
55 | Nathanael Wayne Beenken | Ledyard, IA 50556 | $52,147 |
56 | Joel Daniel Beenken | Swea City, IA 50590 | $52,147 |
57 | Pork View Farms Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $51,980 |
58 | Dennis R Schutjer | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $51,925 |
59 | Jeffrey Price | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $51,739 |
60 | C & J Farm Partnership | Swea City, IA 50590 | $51,738 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”