Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Kossuth County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 92
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $2,339,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ingalls Honey Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,352,287 |
2 | Lji Honey And Pollination | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $642,963 |
3 | Jacob William Ingalls | Titonka, IA 50480 | $201,142 |
4 | Bb Farms Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $15,291 |
5 | Michael Kuhlmann | Ottosen, IA 50570 | $9,054 |
6 | Bormann Red Angus LLC | Livermore, IA 50558 | $7,698 |
7 | Roethler Farms LLC | Algona, IA 50511 | $6,222 |
8 | Michael Steven Berte | Lakota, IA 50451 | $5,270 |
9 | Carl Ray Bormann | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $5,135 |
10 | Alan Seely | Algona, IA 50511 | $5,059 |
11 | Lonnie R Hoien | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $4,988 |
12 | Steven Michael Berte | Lakota, IA 50451 | $4,788 |
13 | Murl Dean Dodds | Algona, IA 50511 | $4,541 |
14 | Matthew A Dornbier | Wesley, IA 50483 | $3,757 |
15 | Richard Florian Hellman | Burt, IA 50522 | $3,708 |
16 | Matthew S Anderson | Algona, IA 50511 | $3,537 |
17 | Calvin James Hefty | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $3,531 |
18 | David Duane Hefty | West Bend, IA 50597 | $3,478 |
19 | David Bruce Garman | Algona, IA 50511 | $3,195 |
20 | Jay Dean Hefty | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $2,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>