Farm Subsidy information
Lee County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Lee County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,962
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lee County, Iowa totaled $277,836,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mabeus Ag Corp | Wever, IA 52658 | $757,571 |
42 | David Edward Schinstock | Salem, IA 52649 | $756,040 |
43 | Harry E Westfall | Donnellson, IA 52625 | $750,791 |
44 | Dustan Paul Wellman | Donnellson, IA 52625 | $742,550 |
45 | Pomberg Farms | West Point, IA 52656 | $737,736 |
46 | Double S Corporation | Donnellson, IA 52625 | $714,972 |
47 | Steven D Newberry | Argyle, IA 52619 | $713,494 |
48 | Greenmark Farm Inc | Wever, IA 52658 | $700,074 |
49 | Holtkamp Ag Enterprises Inc | West Point, IA 52656 | $684,140 |
50 | Tweedy Farm Ltd | Argyle, IA 52619 | $677,863 |
51 | Overton Farms Inc | West Point, IA 52656 | $670,889 |
52 | Ball Bros Corp | Donnellson, IA 52625 | $652,514 |
53 | W R Faeth Et Al | Fort Madison, IA 52627 | $635,646 |
54 | Robert E Fox | Keokuk, IA 52632 | $627,844 |
55 | Bill Meierotto Farm Corp | West Point, IA 52656 | $611,246 |
56 | Houston Farms Corp | Wever, IA 52658 | $605,434 |
57 | John Dingman | Saint Paul, IA 52657 | $603,379 |
58 | Richard Mabeus | Wever, IA 52658 | $600,210 |
59 | Mark E Meierotto | West Point, IA 52656 | $595,826 |
60 | Bentler Farms Inc | Fort Madison, IA 52627 | $589,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”