Total Conservation Programs in Linn County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,655
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Linn County, Iowa totaled $53,125,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Marvin L Johnson Rev Trust | Walker, IA 52352 | $854,218 |
2 | Michael D Bergman | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $627,904 |
3 | Edward J Dusheck | Anamosa, IA 52205 | $483,486 |
4 | Jeanne W Luse Family Trust | Central City, IA 52214 | $462,892 |
5 | Hoke Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $448,496 |
6 | Joseph Henderson | Coggon, IA 52218 | $440,531 |
7 | Klinsky Farms Ltd | Ely, IA 52227 | $397,049 |
8 | Gail-gail N Neumeyer Neumeyer | Walker, IA 52352 | $380,199 |
9 | Eloise Beatty Dennis Revocable Tr | Center Point, IA 52213 | $341,759 |
10 | Robert E Clark | Lisbon, IA 52253 | $326,425 |
11 | Lester Bahr Trust | Marion, IA 52302 | $316,071 |
12 | Linge Farms LLC | Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 | $296,629 |
13 | Robert K Dennis Revocable Trust | Center Point, IA 52213 | $292,205 |
14 | Melvin Daniel Rockwell | Cedar Rapids, IA 52403 | $284,936 |
15 | Robert S Magill | Cedar Rapids, IA 52411 | $275,719 |
16 | John Zach | Ely, IA 52227 | $268,422 |
17 | William Jason Novak | Ely, IA 52227 | $267,369 |
18 | Kenneth Packingham | Central City, IA 52214 | $254,093 |
19 | William D Bowers | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $251,889 |
20 | Michael W Birmingham | Marion, IA 52302 | $250,991 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>