Total Commodity Programs in Louisa County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,835
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Louisa County, Iowa totaled $153,304,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Butler Pork Farm Inc | Wapello, IA 52653 | $475,861 |
82 | Michael E Jennings | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $465,398 |
83 | Joseph Harvey Bloomer | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $458,958 |
84 | Lanz Brothers | Oakville, IA 52646 | $451,589 |
85 | Darrell Herman Egli | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $449,923 |
86 | Wade Alan Edwards | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $444,816 |
87 | Jpp Pork Inc | Ainsworth, IA 52201 | $438,672 |
88 | Fred R Hoopes | Letts, IA 52754 | $430,554 |
89 | Harold C Rees | Crawfordsville, IA 52621 | $429,011 |
90 | Charles Kerr | Wapello, IA 52653 | $428,103 |
91 | Westlake Farms Partnership | Conesville, IA 52739 | $426,925 |
92 | Gerald Chris Buffington | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $417,456 |
93 | Fred Weyrick Jr | Wapello, IA 52653 | $416,952 |
94 | Dale L Howell | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $416,375 |
95 | Kim C Klopfenstein | Winfield, IA 52659 | $412,770 |
96 | Mark L Strawhacker | Wapello, IA 52653 | $410,945 |
97 | Steve A Klopfenstein | Winfield, IA 52659 | $401,968 |
98 | John E O'neill | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $395,542 |
99 | Lloyd L Meyerholz | Wapello, IA 52653 | $394,714 |
100 | Thomas R Bonnichsen | Letts, IA 52754 | $387,463 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”