Conservation Reserve Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 576
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $4,928,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pleasant Grove Land Preservation | Grinnell, IA 50112 | $35,944 |
22 | Linda Kraber | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $35,001 |
23 | Robert Van Weelden | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $34,435 |
24 | Leslie Clair Zimmerman | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $34,075 |
25 | Glenview Family Farms LLC | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $33,636 |
26 | Van Polen Family Farms LLC | Bussey, IA 50044 | $33,076 |
27 | , | $32,664 | |
28 | Ronald Van Der Pol | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $32,280 |
29 | Haley Dunn | Katy, TX 77450 | $32,224 |
30 | Garold L Kelderman Irrev Tr | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $31,600 |
31 | Marjorie Van Polen | Bussey, IA 50044 | $31,451 |
32 | Ronald W Hoy | Bussey, IA 50044 | $31,172 |
33 | Russell J Hammes | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $30,912 |
34 | Kenneth Slagter | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $30,311 |
35 | Henry L Van Arkel | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $29,689 |
36 | Jordan Rath Wood | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $29,048 |
37 | Thomas Kelderman | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $28,701 |
38 | Todd J Parker | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $28,637 |
39 | Duane Harlan Eveland | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $28,600 |
40 | Chamra Farms Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $28,168 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”