Counter Cyclical Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,234
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $9,471,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Marvin Rozenboom Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $32,150 |
42 | Edwin Veldhuizen | Cedar, IA 52543 | $31,418 |
43 | James Irvin Scott | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $31,077 |
44 | Steven Van Maanen | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $31,031 |
45 | Mike Roquet | Hedrick, IA 52563 | $31,015 |
46 | Graneva Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $31,002 |
47 | Gary Wayne De Goey | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $30,887 |
48 | Van Waardhuizen Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $30,765 |
49 | Mark A Jackson | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $30,443 |
50 | Larry Ancell | Leighton, IA 50143 | $29,821 |
51 | Jack Rempe | Leighton, IA 50143 | $29,558 |
52 | Dennis J Brown | Cedar, IA 52543 | $29,045 |
53 | Spring Valley Farms Of Ia Ltd | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $28,650 |
54 | Marvin G Wehrle | Lynnville, IA 50153 | $28,184 |
55 | Top Pork Building Lc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $27,832 |
56 | Franje Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $27,742 |
57 | N Vanmersbergen Inc | Cedar, IA 52543 | $27,588 |
58 | Steve Wanders | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $27,297 |
59 | Allan L Haworth | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $26,803 |
60 | Elvin Lourens Revocable Trust | Cedar, IA 52543 | $26,793 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”