Conservation Reserve Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 587
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $4,678,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Max Jacobs | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $25,682 |
42 | Emmett Vern Thorp Family Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $25,538 |
43 | Duane Walker | Woodstock, IL 60098 | $25,143 |
44 | Michael Bruxvoort | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $24,969 |
45 | Jordan Rath Wood | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $24,671 |
46 | J D Fleener Estate | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $24,600 |
47 | Henry L Van Arkel | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $24,388 |
48 | Neala Irene Veenstra | Newton, IA 50208 | $24,320 |
49 | Russell J Hammes | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $24,177 |
50 | Harley Ver Meer | Pella, IA 50219 | $23,898 |
51 | Jackson Drost | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $23,811 |
52 | Lois Dykstra | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $23,701 |
53 | Marie De Boef | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $23,355 |
54 | Ronald L Meinders | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $23,319 |
55 | Ring Valley Farms Inc | Leighton, IA 50143 | $23,156 |
56 | Nancine Bruxvoort | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $23,027 |
57 | Marie Robbins | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $22,680 |
58 | M & M Terpstra Farms Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $22,380 |
59 | Dorothy Gertrude Smith Estate | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $22,036 |
60 | Mike Dugger | Pella, IA 50219 | $21,920 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”