Loan Deficiency in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,507
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $40,268,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth Vander Linden | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $134,578 |
42 | Dennis J Brown | Cedar, IA 52543 | $133,939 |
43 | Leroy Groenendyk | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $132,713 |
44 | Kenneth Van Donselaar | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $129,250 |
45 | Mark A Jackson | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $128,928 |
46 | Nunnikhoven Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $128,610 |
47 | River Valley Farms | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $128,192 |
48 | S & A Farms Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $127,957 |
49 | Doug Boender | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $127,683 |
50 | Calvin Branderhorst | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $127,578 |
51 | Randy Van Kooten | Lynnville, IA 50153 | $126,485 |
52 | Mc Farms Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $126,325 |
53 | Ryken Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $125,232 |
54 | Double P Pork Corp | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $124,197 |
55 | Danny Lee Van Arendonk | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $123,803 |
56 | Alsons Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $121,616 |
57 | Lawrence D Rouw | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $120,722 |
58 | Leon De Groot | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $120,490 |
59 | James L Van Engelenhoven | Pella, IA 50219 | $119,118 |
60 | Van Waardhuizen Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $118,798 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”