Farm Subsidy information
Mahaska County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,735
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $459,298,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Randy Joe And Kristine Ferguson Rev Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $672,913 |
82 | Franje Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $664,142 |
83 | Doug Boender | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $663,931 |
84 | Mark A Goodman | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $661,968 |
85 | William A Lynch | Victor, IA 52347 | $660,582 |
86 | Kent L Ferguson | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $658,138 |
87 | Larry Ancell | Leighton, IA 50143 | $656,140 |
88 | Danny Lee Van Arendonk | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $655,897 |
89 | Holstein Acres Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $653,544 |
90 | Steven Jay Plate | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $646,822 |
91 | J D Fleener Estate | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $644,292 |
92 | Mark Steinke | Gibson, IA 50104 | $642,521 |
93 | Kenneth De Money | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $633,556 |
94 | Van Donselaar Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $625,183 |
95 | Spring Creek Family Farms LLC | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $621,454 |
96 | Teddy Loyd Winegardner | Lexington, SC 29072 | $620,677 |
97 | Dave Maudlin | Barnes City, IA 50027 | $617,979 |
98 | David R Rogers | Urbandale, IA 50323 | $617,850 |
99 | Jack Rempe | Leighton, IA 50143 | $617,785 |
100 | Wayne De Bruin | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $616,294 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”