Loan Deficiency in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,507
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $40,268,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jager Farms Inc | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $106,101 |
82 | Dales Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $106,079 |
83 | C R & K Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $105,058 |
84 | William Earl Hynick | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $105,050 |
85 | Rob-mar, Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $104,633 |
86 | Laurel D Dejong | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $103,630 |
87 | Bruce David De Bruin | Pella, IA 50219 | $102,901 |
88 | Jon Overbergen | Leighton, IA 50143 | $102,654 |
89 | E & F Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $102,220 |
90 | Keith Van Ee | Pella, IA 50219 | $101,886 |
91 | De Boef Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $100,427 |
92 | David Hardeman | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $100,406 |
93 | Four Tee Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $100,096 |
94 | Kerry Albertson | Fremont, IA 52561 | $99,149 |
95 | Jerome Fynaardt | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $98,900 |
96 | Daverne Witt | Cedar, IA 52543 | $97,480 |
97 | Steven Roger Boender | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $96,618 |
98 | Black Oak Pork Inc | Leighton, IA 50143 | $96,454 |
99 | Charles Mick Corp | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $95,950 |
100 | Dan W Edgren | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $95,888 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”