Farm Subsidy information
Mahaska County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Mahaska County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 673
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $14,894,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jimolene Walston | Vinton, IA 52349 | $18,133 |
102 | Scott Anderson | Pella, IA 50219 | $18,036 |
103 | Shifu Zhen | Kekaha, HI 96752 | $17,805 |
104 | Van Waardhuizen Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $17,676 |
105 | Robert Charles Oldham | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $17,428 |
106 | David Hardeman | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $16,946 |
107 | Mark Jansen | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $16,863 |
108 | Brent Molyneux Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $16,773 |
109 | Bryan Molyneux Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $16,773 |
110 | Elizabeth A Stout | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $16,741 |
111 | , | $16,741 | |
112 | Gary Nace | Bussey, IA 50044 | $16,686 |
113 | Gary Lynn Herr | Fremont, IA 52561 | $16,447 |
114 | Scott C Anderson | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $16,363 |
115 | Gregory A Gordy | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $15,911 |
116 | Sandra I Richards | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $15,683 |
117 | Vernon-wells Rev Tr | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $15,574 |
118 | Darin G Boyd | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $15,394 |
119 | , | $15,394 | |
120 | C John Crill | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $15,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”