Conservation Reserve Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,831
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $112,308,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Wilbur Hoy & Virginia Hoy Trust | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $250,542 |
102 | Bonne Terre Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32964 | $249,875 |
103 | Gary Nace | Bussey, IA 50044 | $249,652 |
104 | Wm E Patterson | Montezuma, IA 50171 | $247,000 |
105 | Arlen Boyd | Hot Springs Village, AR 71909 | $246,158 |
106 | William Van Polen Jr | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $243,822 |
107 | Haley Dunn | Katy, TX 77450 | $241,654 |
108 | Rob Vos | Pella, IA 50219 | $240,986 |
109 | Marilyn Edel | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $237,153 |
110 | J L T Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $234,865 |
111 | Robert And Betty Vangenderen Revo | Pella, IA 50219 | $234,861 |
112 | Marie Robbins | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $233,033 |
113 | John Thomas Bambara | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $232,335 |
114 | Andy Antolik Jr | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $229,342 |
115 | Richard J Vande Haar | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $229,319 |
116 | Terry Brown | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $227,044 |
117 | Susan Grant Thorp Family Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $225,504 |
118 | Earl D Rodgers | Waipahu, HI 96797 | $224,545 |
119 | Nancine Bruxvoort | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $221,895 |
120 | Mary Garr | Fremont, IA 52561 | $221,545 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”