Loan Deficiency in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,507
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $40,268,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John Rupert Ferguson | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $95,231 |
102 | Lawrence A Roose- Lawrence And Helen Roose Revocab | Pella, IA 50219 | $95,214 |
103 | Jeffrey D Owens | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $94,893 |
104 | Don Parlet | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $94,757 |
105 | Randy Joe And Kristine Ferguson Rev Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $93,974 |
106 | Stanley D Boender | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $93,874 |
107 | Jerry L Fynaardt Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $93,870 |
108 | Neil Albertson | Fremont, IA 52561 | $93,522 |
109 | Dick Drost | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $92,986 |
110 | Top Pork Building Lc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $92,915 |
111 | N Vanmersbergen Inc | Cedar, IA 52543 | $92,887 |
112 | Lone Spruce Farms Inc | Wellsville, KS 66092 | $92,852 |
113 | Richland Acres Ltd | Pella, IA 50219 | $92,128 |
114 | Albertson Franklin Corp | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $91,839 |
115 | Lee A Veldhuizen Revocable Trust | Pella, IA 50219 | $91,556 |
116 | Allan L Haworth | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $90,462 |
117 | Edward S Goemaat | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $90,082 |
118 | Scott J Van Veldhuizen | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $89,630 |
119 | Brett Ferguson | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $89,541 |
120 | Larry Neal Crosby | Fremont, IA 52561 | $88,843 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”