Conservation Reserve Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 587
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $4,678,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Gary E Ver Ploegh | Fremont, IA 52561 | $12,937 |
122 | Henry Van Rheenen | Pella, IA 50219 | $12,922 |
123 | Ron De Jonge | Zeeland, MI 49464 | $12,911 |
124 | Andy Antolik Jr | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $12,741 |
125 | Russell L Darland | Barnes City, IA 50027 | $12,687 |
126 | Pour Bouy Enterprises LLC | Montezuma, IA 50171 | $12,622 |
127 | Michael L Phillips | Montezuma, IA 50171 | $12,619 |
128 | Kenneth D Hoksbergen | Grinnell, IA 50112 | $12,472 |
129 | Travis Turnbull | Pella, IA 50219 | $12,335 |
130 | Nellie J Meinders | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $12,298 |
131 | Terry Brown | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $12,254 |
132 | Rex M Critchlow | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $12,200 |
133 | Cjd Farms LLC | Montezuma, IA 50171 | $12,196 |
134 | Jeremy De Ronde | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $12,187 |
135 | Larry E Rook | Pella, IA 50219 | $12,184 |
136 | Mahaska Pork Limited | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $12,010 |
137 | Nunnikhoven Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $11,800 |
138 | John Thomas Bambara | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $11,677 |
139 | David Prine | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $11,649 |
140 | Jackaline P Morris Trust | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $11,515 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”