Farm Subsidy information
Mahaska County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,735
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $459,298,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ver Steegh Brothers Farms | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $4,640,826 |
2 | Conrad Brothers | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $4,118,671 |
3 | Augustine & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $2,647,039 |
4 | V G Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $2,526,034 |
5 | Mahaska Pork Limited | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $2,080,159 |
6 | Chamra Farms Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $2,078,365 |
7 | Allied Gas & Chemical | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $2,061,877 |
8 | M E Molyneux & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $1,956,669 |
9 | J & J Vande Voort Farm Corp | Pella, IA 50219 | $1,865,010 |
10 | S & A Farms Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $1,561,112 |
11 | Par 3 Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $1,519,818 |
12 | De Jong Brothers | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $1,504,442 |
13 | Steven John Stek | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $1,398,714 |
14 | Edward Allen | Bussey, IA 50044 | $1,384,701 |
15 | Graneva Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $1,302,540 |
16 | C John Crill | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $1,294,818 |
17 | Dennis Veldhuizen | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $1,290,366 |
18 | De Bruin Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $1,265,941 |
19 | Lyle Blom | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $1,236,814 |
20 | River Valley Farms Partnership | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $1,224,258 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>