Farm Subsidy information
Mahaska County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Mahaska County, Iowa, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,155
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $27,343,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ver Steegh Brothers Farms | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $355,921 |
2 | Mahaska Pork Limited | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $221,612 |
3 | Boender Custom Farming Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $219,241 |
4 | Chamra Farms Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $215,665 |
5 | Augustine & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $200,315 |
6 | Bryan Molyneux Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $185,061 |
7 | V G Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $180,630 |
8 | Brent Molyneux Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $180,602 |
9 | Conrad Brothers | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $176,714 |
10 | J & J Vande Voort Farm Corp | Pella, IA 50219 | $160,833 |
11 | M E Molyneux & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $155,635 |
12 | De Bruin Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $152,381 |
13 | Jason David Rogers | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $151,283 |
14 | Edwin Veldhuizen | Cedar, IA 52543 | $142,910 |
15 | S & A Farms Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $130,356 |
16 | River Valley Farms Partnership | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $123,094 |
17 | Doug Boender | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $121,796 |
18 | Paul J Johnson | Deep River, IA 52222 | $118,329 |
19 | Franje Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $110,872 |
20 | De Jong Brothers | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $109,530 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>