Conservation Reserve Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,720
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $102,643,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Steinke | Gibson, IA 50104 | $344,620 |
42 | Duane Walker | Woodstock, IL 60098 | $340,196 |
43 | Rex Anderson | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $337,392 |
44 | Michael L Phillips | Montezuma, IA 50171 | $331,200 |
45 | Russell J Hammes | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $328,497 |
46 | Robert Ray Van Polen | Bussey, IA 50044 | $328,274 |
47 | Ring Valley Farms Inc | Leighton, IA 50143 | $327,922 |
48 | Marion Terpstra | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $325,793 |
49 | Rodney Mc Curdy | Las Vegas, NV 89108 | $325,730 |
50 | Joseph Holub | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $324,609 |
51 | Beth Brostrom-rev Tr | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $319,585 |
52 | Jimolene Walston | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $317,399 |
53 | M E Molyneux & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $317,004 |
54 | Garold L Kelderman Irrev Tr | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $316,355 |
55 | Gamma Farms Ltd | Columbia, MO 65203 | $314,407 |
56 | Vos Family South Farm Ptnsp | Ireton, IA 51027 | $312,856 |
57 | Rob-mar, Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $311,093 |
58 | Charles Tyrrel | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $306,249 |
59 | David Hardeman | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $302,708 |
60 | Dorothy Vander Pol | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $295,641 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”