Conservation Reserve Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,831
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $112,308,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Steinke | Gibson, IA 50104 | $380,998 |
42 | Marvin Rozenboom Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $380,235 |
43 | Ring Valley Farms Inc | Leighton, IA 50143 | $374,234 |
44 | Arthur Dykstra | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $372,451 |
45 | Verdadean Allen | Bussey, IA 50044 | $362,814 |
46 | Gary Kelderman | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $352,439 |
47 | Rob-mar, Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $351,805 |
48 | Robert Ray Van Polen | Bussey, IA 50044 | $349,192 |
49 | Michael L Phillips | Montezuma, IA 50171 | $347,684 |
50 | Duane Walker | Woodstock, IL 60098 | $340,196 |
51 | Rex Anderson | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $337,392 |
52 | David Hardeman | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $336,600 |
53 | Lois Dykstra | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $326,059 |
54 | Marion Terpstra | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $325,793 |
55 | Rodney Mc Curdy | Las Vegas, NV 89108 | $325,730 |
56 | Joseph Holub | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $324,609 |
57 | Ronald Van Der Pol | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $323,510 |
58 | Beth Brostrom-rev Tr | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $319,585 |
59 | Gamma Farms Ltd | Columbia, MO 65203 | $317,641 |
60 | Jimolene Walston | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $317,399 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”