Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Marion County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 188
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Marion County, Iowa totaled $317,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth L Sytsma | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $2,394 |
42 | Roger Sytsma | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $2,394 |
43 | Troy De Jong | Bussey, IA 50044 | $2,302 |
44 | Veenstra Cattle Company | Pella, IA 50219 | $2,242 |
45 | David R Kingery-david R Kingery Trust | Monroe, IA 50170 | $2,186 |
46 | Andy Hazer | Columbia, IA 50057 | $2,096 |
47 | William Joseph Wallace | Pleasantville, IA 50225 | $2,034 |
48 | Lane Alan Williams | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $2,010 |
49 | Kyle S Kingery | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $2,007 |
50 | Steven Jay Van Steenwyk | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $2,003 |
51 | Wayne R Hoelscher | Columbia, IA 50057 | $1,853 |
52 | Marty Thomas Van Vliet | Otley, IA 50214 | $1,840 |
53 | Duane Schmaltz | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $1,839 |
54 | John P Schmaltz | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $1,839 |
55 | M Lavonne Pendroy-lavonne Pendroy Trust | Monroe, IA 50170 | $1,752 |
56 | David Dermody | Williamsburg, IA 52361 | $1,743 |
57 | Richard Kauzlarich | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $1,661 |
58 | James Arthur Daniel Ambers | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $1,649 |
59 | Michael J Metz | Lacona, IA 50139 | $1,577 |
60 | Kenneth Schneider | Lacona, IA 50139 | $1,572 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”