Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mitchell County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 579
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mitchell County, Iowa totaled $4,712,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Benjamin A Johnson | Floyd, IA 50435 | $25,995 |
22 | Lyle D Newton | Stacyville, IA 50476 | $25,583 |
23 | Veronica Newton | Stacyville, IA 50476 | $25,583 |
24 | Valley Road Farms Inc | Riceville, IA 50466 | $25,564 |
25 | Alan D Runde | Riceville, IA 50466 | $25,530 |
26 | Russell Nelson | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $25,103 |
27 | Joseph E Merten | Mc Intire, IA 50455 | $25,037 |
28 | Myron J Kuper | Osage, IA 50461 | $24,371 |
29 | Randy E Nerad | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $24,357 |
30 | Andrew Johnson | Floyd, IA 50435 | $24,268 |
31 | Cody L Kuntz | Mason City, IA 50401 | $24,014 |
32 | Next Generation Farms LLC | Ames, IA 50010 | $23,802 |
33 | Christopher Robert Edgington | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $23,459 |
34 | Thomas Allen Edgington | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $23,459 |
35 | Steven A Gerk | Osage, IA 50461 | $22,720 |
36 | Tim Koch Farms LLC | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $22,409 |
37 | Alan And Jill Witt Revocable Trust - Alan Witt | Osage, IA 50461 | $22,374 |
38 | Pork N Pine Hill Inc | Stacyville, IA 50476 | $22,261 |
39 | Joyce E Ruehlow | Osage, IA 50461 | $21,778 |
40 | Darwin K Ruehlow | Osage, IA 50461 | $21,778 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”