Total Conservation Programs in Mitchell County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 461
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mitchell County, Iowa totaled $2,144,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary Hyland | Orchard, IA 50460 | $9,579 |
62 | Stephen G Mccarthy | Mc Intire, IA 50455 | $9,365 |
63 | , | $9,306 | |
64 | Stephen K Eastman | Riceville, IA 50466 | $9,203 |
65 | C John Schwarck | Riceville, IA 50466 | $8,935 |
66 | Jahr Residuary Trust | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $8,841 |
67 | Kim Schwab | Little Cedar, IA 50454 | $8,749 |
68 | Bridget K Peterson | Manly, IA 50456 | $8,634 |
69 | Richard Nerad | Osage, IA 50461 | $8,548 |
70 | Richard H Meirick | Osage, IA 50461 | $8,546 |
71 | Eugene Merten | Adams, MN 55909 | $8,351 |
72 | Brian Mellmann | Osage, IA 50461 | $8,285 |
73 | Robert N Kolbet | Mason City, IA 50401 | $8,276 |
74 | Laurie J Johnson | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $8,253 |
75 | Ernest K Schofield Rev Trust | Riceville, IA 50466 | $8,123 |
76 | Roger P Smith | Stacyville, IA 50476 | $7,995 |
77 | Joyce M Toppin | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $7,985 |
78 | E Bradley Toppin | Charles City, IA 50616 | $7,837 |
79 | Shauna Leah Rabinowitz Trust | Berkeley, CA 94701 | $7,760 |
80 | Kurtis J Hemann | Stacyville, IA 50476 | $7,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”