Counter Cyclical Program in Monona County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,167
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Monona County, Iowa totaled $11,363,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Michael M Brenden | Whiting, IA 51063 | $20,287 |
162 | Lyle Lee Ernst | Whiting, IA 51063 | $20,261 |
163 | James Parker | Sloan, IA 51055 | $20,222 |
164 | Michael D Nielsen | Mapleton, IA 51034 | $20,066 |
165 | Timothy Wayne Kafton | Mapleton, IA 51034 | $20,004 |
166 | Franklin John Salter | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $19,990 |
167 | Anthony Wayne Salter | Modale, IA 51556 | $19,990 |
168 | Cheryl Kay Salter | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $19,990 |
169 | Mary Frances Salter | Modale, IA 51556 | $19,990 |
170 | Timothy S Treiber | Danbury, IA 51019 | $19,982 |
171 | Steve Longlee | Hornick, IA 51026 | $19,651 |
172 | Robert Michael Flanigan | Ute, IA 51060 | $19,459 |
173 | Richard L Schleis | Mapleton, IA 51034 | $19,424 |
174 | Wolpert Farms Limited Partnership | Sioux City, IA 51103 | $19,390 |
175 | Thomas E Macclure | Whiting, IA 51063 | $19,221 |
176 | Jeffery Lynn Berens | Dunlap, IA 51529 | $19,140 |
177 | Roger Elvin Johnson | Ute, IA 51060 | $19,127 |
178 | Daniel Folsom | Hornick, IA 51026 | $19,118 |
179 | Eric Deryl Hennings | Denison, IA 51442 | $18,898 |
180 | Ronald Gordon Nichols | Moorhead, IA 51558 | $18,843 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”