Production Flexibility Program in Montgomery County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,231
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Montgomery County, Iowa totaled $21,401,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | K R C Farms Inc | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $278,362 |
2 | Joseph Hossle | Emerson, IA 51533 | $242,107 |
3 | Jar Farms Ltd | Crescent, IA 51526 | $219,393 |
4 | Flying A Cattle Company | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $187,023 |
5 | Jody M Hossle | Emerson, IA 51533 | $186,074 |
6 | Karwal Farms Inc | Elliott, IA 51532 | $184,688 |
7 | Daniel L Phelps | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $162,926 |
8 | David Hart | Stanton, IA 51573 | $159,833 |
9 | Kernen Farms Inc | Villisca, IA 50864 | $158,145 |
10 | Green Thumb Enterprises | Villisca, IA 50864 | $151,550 |
11 | Donald Morris Corporation | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $150,864 |
12 | C & K Farms | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $150,711 |
13 | Ronald D Adams | Elliott, IA 51532 | $147,722 |
14 | Lamont R Wallin | Stanton, IA 51573 | $139,613 |
15 | Rodney G Devries | Elliott, IA 51532 | $131,023 |
16 | Knute Hallquist | Stanton, IA 51573 | $130,655 |
17 | Circle G Farms Of Ia Inc | Elliott, IA 51532 | $125,274 |
18 | Michael Mead | Stanton, IA 51573 | $121,720 |
19 | Max Hossle | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $120,080 |
20 | Douglas Allen Lundgren | Stanton, IA 51573 | $119,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>