Farm Subsidy information
Montgomery County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Montgomery County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,693
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montgomery County, Iowa totaled $298,993,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Leonard Sandholm | Stanton, IA 51573 | $860,011 |
42 | Keith Harold | Essex, IA 51638 | $858,627 |
43 | Mark Focht | Villisca, IA 50864 | $854,301 |
44 | Kathryn J Carlson | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $851,509 |
45 | James Norris | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $847,338 |
46 | Kit C Johnson | Stanton, IA 51573 | $819,010 |
47 | Wetterlind Farms Inc | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $816,102 |
48 | Four K Farms Inc | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $814,653 |
49 | Charles A Mccoppin Rev Trust | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $809,153 |
50 | Wheeler Land LLC | Villisca, IA 50864 | $808,798 |
51 | Donald J Waters | Cumberland, IA 50843 | $789,558 |
52 | James R Commers Trust | Omaha, NE 68124 | $786,953 |
53 | Heuer Operations Inc | Elliott, IA 51532 | $784,245 |
54 | Petersridge Farms LLC | Council Bluffs, IA 51502 | $764,164 |
55 | Rietkull Inc | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $753,161 |
56 | Rick Carlson | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $749,669 |
57 | Bryan Huff | Emerson, IA 51533 | $735,562 |
58 | Michael Mead | Stanton, IA 51573 | $735,062 |
59 | Douglas Maher | Stanton, IA 51573 | $734,895 |
60 | Thielen Living Trust | Murrieta, CA 92562 | $733,066 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”