Total Commodity Programs in Montgomery County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 137
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Montgomery County, Iowa totaled $381,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kyle Alexander Ramsey | Stanton, IA 51573 | $2,805 |
42 | Brandon Lee Bruning | Villisca, IA 50864 | $2,794 |
43 | Cole Christopher Winther | Nodaway, IA 50857 | $2,768 |
44 | Andrew Mark Focht | Villisca, IA 50864 | $2,658 |
45 | Grant Michael Focht | Stanton, IA 51573 | $2,637 |
46 | John Dale Beem | Villisca, IA 50864 | $2,610 |
47 | Linda S Head Revocable Trust | Omaha, NE 68137 | $2,539 |
48 | Kyle David Peterson | Stanton, IA 51573 | $2,417 |
49 | Cashatt & Sons Corporation | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $2,238 |
50 | Michael Paul Bruning | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $2,176 |
51 | Lois Pendleton | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $2,120 |
52 | Jarrett Maynes | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $1,905 |
53 | Susan Peterman | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $1,794 |
54 | Ann Marie Standerwick | Grinnell, IA 50112 | $1,793 |
55 | Susan A Johnson | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $1,733 |
56 | Austin Nicholas Palmquist | Stanton, IA 51573 | $1,719 |
57 | Terry Westerlund | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $1,689 |
58 | Phyllis Sunberg Revocable Trust | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $1,662 |
59 | Wallin Daughters Irrevocable Trust 2 Samantha Wall | Council Bluffs, IA 51502 | $1,629 |
60 | Deborah A Kelley | Papillion, NE 68046 | $1,473 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”