Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Osceola County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 124
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Osceola County, Iowa totaled $2,329,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Rodney Bosma | Rushmore, MN 56168 | $17,302 |
42 | Trei Corp | Sibley, IA 51249 | $16,980 |
43 | Matthew B Kooima | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $16,315 |
44 | Marlin Roelfs | Ashton, IA 51232 | $16,304 |
45 | Thomas A Doeden | Sibley, IA 51249 | $16,239 |
46 | Mills Galenbeck & Wall Partnershi | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $15,866 |
47 | L Craig Hayenga | Worthington, MN 56187 | $15,674 |
48 | K & S Growers LLC | Ashton, IA 51232 | $15,149 |
49 | Harold Nelson Anderson | Lake Park, IA 51347 | $14,691 |
50 | Joyce Mulder | Rock Rapids, IA 51246 | $14,084 |
51 | Harris J Mulder | Rock Rapids, IA 51246 | $14,084 |
52 | Mark Wolterstorff | Ocheyedan, IA 51354 | $13,600 |
53 | Joe Schiphoff | Hartley, IA 51346 | $13,428 |
54 | Hellinga Family Farms | Ocheyedan, IA 51354 | $13,254 |
55 | Namtvedt Osceola Farm Lp | Spencer, IA 51301 | $11,758 |
56 | Orlyn Tesch | Hartley, IA 51346 | $10,962 |
57 | Hibbing Farms Inc | Hartley, IA 51346 | $10,959 |
58 | Jed Cox | Ashton, IA 51232 | $10,794 |
59 | Dj72 Inc | Spirit Lake, IA 51360 | $10,592 |
60 | Kenneth L Smith | Lake Park, IA 51347 | $10,589 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”