Counter Cyclical Program in Palo Alto County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,157
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Palo Alto County, Iowa totaled $12,449,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ulrich Brothers | Mallard, IA 50562 | $36,476 |
82 | Mersch Farms Inc | Bellingham, WA 98228 | $36,427 |
83 | Elsenbast Farms Inc | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $36,419 |
84 | C & D Farms | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $36,116 |
85 | Kollasch Family Lc | Algona, IA 50511 | $35,883 |
86 | Kassel Enterprises Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $35,882 |
87 | Thomas P Schnieders | Mallard, IA 50562 | $35,332 |
88 | Rolo Farms Inc | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $34,847 |
89 | A & H Farms Inc | Spencer, IA 51301 | $34,847 |
90 | John W Brown | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $34,758 |
91 | Joyce Ag Inc | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $34,647 |
92 | Melvin L Molitor | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $34,480 |
93 | Kollasch Land & Livestock Inc | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $34,386 |
94 | David Tonderum Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $34,282 |
95 | Charles L Sarazine | Algona, IA 50511 | $34,211 |
96 | Chism Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $33,942 |
97 | John L Leuer | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $33,514 |
98 | Michael M Moran | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $33,474 |
99 | Luann J Opheim | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $33,144 |
100 | George Arthur Bierstedt | Fenton, IA 50539 | $32,871 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”