Conservation Reserve Program in Pocahontas County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 710
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pocahontas County, Iowa totaled $2,560,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary Joseph Wells | Fonda, IA 50540 | $10,688 |
62 | Mark E Wells | Fonda, IA 50540 | $10,685 |
63 | Robert Ricklefs | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $10,673 |
64 | Grant T Wells | Fonda, IA 50540 | $10,272 |
65 | Gaylord Henderson | Havelock, IA 50546 | $10,132 |
66 | , | $10,130 | |
67 | Craig Peterson | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $9,985 |
68 | Daniel P Stumpf | Fonda, IA 50540 | $9,810 |
69 | Kevin D Sernett | Dakota City, IA 50529 | $9,807 |
70 | Jonelle L Kann | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $9,804 |
71 | Deborah A Holtorf | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $9,804 |
72 | Lavern E Spaulding | Gilmore City, IA 50541 | $9,770 |
73 | Alvena E Wasko Trust | Urbandale, IA 50322 | $9,736 |
74 | Fork Creek Farms LLC | Columbus, OH 43235 | $9,645 |
75 | Kimberly J Johnson | Albert City, IA 50510 | $9,605 |
76 | Frank And Murlene Seeley Trust | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $9,212 |
77 | Grekur Ltd | Humboldt, IA 50548 | $8,982 |
78 | Nedved Farms | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $8,979 |
79 | Rubert E Erickson | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $8,871 |
80 | Laurie Sebben | Omaha, NE 68136 | $8,856 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”