Total Commodity Programs in Pocahontas County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 154
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pocahontas County, Iowa totaled $745,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Douglas Theodore Lanning | Gilmore City, IA 50541 | $1,067 |
102 | Shirley Harrold Living Trust | Palmer, IA 50571 | $1,045 |
103 | Coletta Wernimont | Fonda, IA 50540 | $1,026 |
104 | Deyoung Farms | Laurens, IA 50554 | $1,000 |
105 | J Michael Crotty | Havelock, IA 50546 | $996 |
106 | Matthew M Nedved | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $977 |
107 | Mildred A Rosdail Revocable Trust Agreement | Humboldt, IA 50548 | $976 |
108 | James R Rosdail Family Trust | Humboldt, IA 50548 | $976 |
109 | Amdj LLC | Humboldt, IA 50548 | $973 |
110 | Irva V Krause | Pomeroy, IA 50575 | $961 |
111 | Carlton H Dewall | Gilmore City, IA 50541 | $957 |
112 | Thomas Martin Aronson | Albert City, IA 50510 | $880 |
113 | Margaret Vanalstine Testamentory | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $866 |
114 | Bonnie Halligan | Gilmore City, IA 50541 | $859 |
115 | Keith Stauffer | Gilmore City, IA 50541 | $793 |
116 | Jacob E. Rittgers | Rolfe, IA 50581 | $787 |
117 | Joshua J Walsh | Newell, IA 50568 | $741 |
118 | Eileen A Amos | Glendale, AZ 85308 | $731 |
119 | Alvena E Wasko Trust | Urbandale, IA 50322 | $727 |
120 | David Stauffer | Belle Plaine, IA 52208 | $710 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”