Production Flexibility Program in Ringgold County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,141
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Ringgold County, Iowa totaled $11,786,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Loren R Haveman Rev Trust | Plattsmouth, NE 68048 | $70,638 |
22 | Charles Edward Jeanes | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $68,221 |
23 | Richard Weehler | Blockton, IA 50836 | $68,196 |
24 | Frank Richards | Tingley, IA 50863 | $67,393 |
25 | Michael Eugene Ford | Tingley, IA 50863 | $64,924 |
26 | Harold Dean Nelson | Clearfield, IA 50840 | $63,759 |
27 | Ringgold Jv | New Market, IA 51646 | $63,630 |
28 | James Howard Goins | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $63,469 |
29 | Patrick O Weeda | Tingley, IA 50863 | $62,607 |
30 | David I Wiley | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $62,565 |
31 | Kenneth Andrew Sobotka | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $62,040 |
32 | Randy Allen Bishop | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $62,036 |
33 | Robert Weehler | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $61,629 |
34 | Richard Lee Elmer | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $61,465 |
35 | Everett Lee Faris | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $60,887 |
36 | Green Farms | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $59,852 |
37 | John A Kiburz | Tingley, IA 50863 | $59,709 |
38 | Curtis - Curtis K. L Keith Lining | Shannon City, IA 50861 | $59,610 |
39 | Roger Lewis Shields | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $59,507 |
40 | Brammer Farm Corp | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $58,984 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”