Counter Cyclical Program in Ringgold County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 818
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Ringgold County, Iowa totaled $3,451,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Michael E Mercer | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $9,720 |
102 | James Francis Smith | Beaconsfield, IA 50074 | $9,709 |
103 | Sandra M Adli Wood | Kellerton, IA 50133 | $9,401 |
104 | James Anthony Sinclair | Melrose, IA 52569 | $9,378 |
105 | Douglas Dean Redenius | West Des Moines, IA 50266 | $9,378 |
106 | Dennis L Stephens Revocable Trust | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $9,316 |
107 | Timothy Stephens | Davenport, IA 52803 | $9,316 |
108 | Kevin K Creveling | Ellston, IA 50074 | $9,280 |
109 | Ronald L Creveling | Ellston, IA 50074 | $9,265 |
110 | Lee Creveling | Ellston, IA 50074 | $9,251 |
111 | H & M Akers Ltd | Kellerton, IA 50133 | $9,224 |
112 | Marty Lesan | Kellerton, IA 50133 | $9,192 |
113 | Payload Trucking Inc | Kellerton, IA 50133 | $9,118 |
114 | Sackett Farm Inc | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $8,627 |
115 | Brian Mobley | Benton, IA 50835 | $8,617 |
116 | James Reed Parrish | Lenox, IA 50851 | $8,502 |
117 | Josh Shields | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $8,471 |
118 | Robert Lee Andrews | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $8,454 |
119 | Lawrence Rychnovsky | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $8,394 |
120 | R & J Schnoor Living Trust | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $8,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”