Market Loss Assistance Program in Ringgold County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 955
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Ringgold County, Iowa totaled $6,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Robert Lee Andrews | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $17,327 |
102 | Ronald L Creveling | Ellston, IA 50074 | $17,235 |
103 | Kevin K Creveling | Ellston, IA 50074 | $17,235 |
104 | Theron M Johnson | Redding, IA 50860 | $17,209 |
105 | Mobley Construction Inc | Benton, IA 50835 | $17,104 |
106 | Douglas Earl Poore | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $17,084 |
107 | Lee Creveling | Ellston, IA 50074 | $16,984 |
108 | Steve Werner | Shannon City, IA 50861 | $16,762 |
109 | John - John R Wilson R Wilson | Clearfield, IA 50840 | $16,723 |
110 | Melvin Richards | Shannon City, IA 50861 | $16,564 |
111 | Mark Rychnovsky | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $16,540 |
112 | James Reed Parrish | Lenox, IA 50851 | $16,230 |
113 | R & J Schnoor Living Trust | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $16,199 |
114 | Leroy Trimble Trust | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $16,068 |
115 | 4k Family Limited Partnership | Blockton, IA 50836 | $15,883 |
116 | Russell Stewart | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $15,767 |
117 | Lowell Raymond Schaefer | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $15,682 |
118 | William Dale Andrews | Benton, IA 50835 | $15,623 |
119 | Daryl Hartley Kline | Afton, IA 50830 | $15,505 |
120 | Gary Joe Klejch | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $15,490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”