Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Ringgold County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 499
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Ringgold County, Iowa totaled $12,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | England Brothers Farm | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $31,158 |
122 | Brett Lewis Shields | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $31,008 |
123 | Iowa State Bank ** | Monroe, WI 53566 | $30,717 |
124 | Robert W Smith | Leon, IA 50144 | $30,354 |
125 | Bill David Hynek | Beaconsfield, IA 50074 | $29,740 |
126 | Rick Wolf | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $29,659 |
127 | Vicky Ann Leonard | Clearfield, IA 50840 | $29,375 |
128 | Cassady J Hosfield | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $29,312 |
129 | Kenneth Dale Schaefer | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $28,980 |
130 | Aaron Michael Gladfelder | Shannon City, IA 50861 | $28,975 |
131 | Kevin C Sporrer | Carroll, IA 51401 | $28,931 |
132 | Bessie Austin | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $28,562 |
133 | Greg Mobley | Blockton, IA 50836 | $28,338 |
134 | Clearview-routh Lp | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $28,096 |
135 | Caleb Logan Baker | Clearfield, IA 50840 | $27,974 |
136 | Jeffery John Sickels | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $27,611 |
137 | Richard Lee Elmer | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $27,026 |
138 | Donald R Pollock | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $27,002 |
139 | Hal Dean Veatch | Kent, IA 50851 | $26,857 |
140 | Travis Kyle Shaha | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $26,771 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”