Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Ringgold County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 110
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Ringgold County, Iowa totaled $712,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David Loutzenhiser | Blockton, IA 50836 | $31,767 |
2 | Eldon Woltz Trust | Des Moines, IA 50316 | $28,579 |
3 | Marilyn Besh | Livingston, AL 35470 | $23,259 |
4 | James Lavon Eason | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $21,322 |
5 | Dale Everett Walters | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $20,033 |
6 | Robert Dale Mohr | Lenox, IA 50851 | $19,363 |
7 | Marvin Bruce Quick | Tingley, IA 50863 | $19,277 |
8 | John R Besh | Livingston, AL 35470 | $18,933 |
9 | Gary W Hartsook | Shannon City, IA 50861 | $17,925 |
10 | John Francis Whittington | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $16,041 |
11 | Everett Lee Faris | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $14,288 |
12 | Karen Deanne Catanzareti | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $13,768 |
13 | James Francis Smith | Beaconsfield, IA 50074 | $12,781 |
14 | Richard Lee Mercer | Kellerton, IA 50133 | $12,718 |
15 | Louis Roy Lumbard | Creston, IA 50801 | $12,348 |
16 | James L Werner | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $11,936 |
17 | James Howard Goins | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $11,877 |
18 | Harold A Cooper | Kellerton, IA 50133 | $11,779 |
19 | Ruth B Knudson | Marshalltown, IA 50158 | $11,303 |
20 | Joe & Dan Cunning Partnership | Mount Ayr, IA 50854 | $11,234 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>