Farm Subsidy information
Sac County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Sac County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,575
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sac County, Iowa totaled $492,681,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Daryl Lee Scharn | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,138,007 |
42 | Scott D Greenlee | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,131,349 |
43 | Pemble Farms Ltd | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,123,721 |
44 | Russell E Pickhinke | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,117,893 |
45 | Mark Anthony Wernimont | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,099,951 |
46 | Brian & Denise Nieland Inc | Breda, IA 51436 | $1,081,550 |
47 | Mike Bettin | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $1,057,798 |
48 | Iowa Plains Farms | Lake View, IA 51450 | $1,052,899 |
49 | Daniel Dean Ackerman | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,050,417 |
50 | Covey Farms Company | Early, IA 50535 | $1,049,462 |
51 | R & S Renze Inc | Carroll, IA 51401 | $1,004,383 |
52 | Dennis D Werkmeister | Lake View, IA 51450 | $982,756 |
53 | Robert C Youngren | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $977,654 |
54 | David Lee Johnson | Sac City, IA 50583 | $973,996 |
55 | Dale F Drey | Lake View, IA 51450 | $958,696 |
56 | Timothy J Mohr | Early, IA 50535 | $952,094 |
57 | Larry Dean Hauser | Lake View, IA 51450 | $944,883 |
58 | David Alan Schultz | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $934,036 |
59 | Daniel Joseph Drey | Schaller, IA 51053 | $931,894 |
60 | D Schmitt LLC | Early, IA 50535 | $931,849 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”