Conservation Reserve Program in Sac County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,634
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sac County, Iowa totaled $46,998,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mike Bettin | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $118,739 |
82 | Everett Edwin Hinrichs | Lytton, IA 50561 | $118,148 |
83 | Rpr Family Farms Inc | Horseshoe Bend, AR 72512 | $116,811 |
84 | Lietz Farms Partnership | Yetter, IA 51433 | $116,156 |
85 | Rjr Properties Inc | Sac City, IA 50583 | $114,799 |
86 | Jeffrey R Kreft | Sac City, IA 50583 | $114,622 |
87 | Gary D Wicker | Lake View, IA 51450 | $113,664 |
88 | Steven J Watts | Sac City, IA 50583 | $113,621 |
89 | Cindy Jacobson | Lakeside, IA 50588 | $112,025 |
90 | James A Meyer | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $110,825 |
91 | Bar V Feedlot Inc | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $110,798 |
92 | Daryl Lee Scharn | Sac City, IA 50583 | $110,745 |
93 | Mark S Ashbaugh | Columbia, MO 65203 | $109,659 |
94 | M E Hoffman | Sac City, IA 50583 | $108,817 |
95 | Maude Limited Partnership | Spirit Lake, IA 51360 | $108,697 |
96 | Larry Gene Domino | Sac City, IA 50583 | $107,328 |
97 | Sarah Kay Osborne | Santa Ana, CA 92705 | $107,152 |
98 | Albert Bethune | Hemet, CA 92544 | $107,152 |
99 | Pray Family LLC | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $106,586 |
100 | Todd M Bettin | Lake View, IA 51450 | $105,870 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”