Conservation Reserve Program in Shelby County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,549
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Shelby County, Iowa totaled $53,925,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Martin Trust LLC | Estes Park, CO 80517 | $117,031 |
122 | Duane J Carroll | Avoca, IA 51521 | $116,938 |
123 | Kenneth Brinker Irrev Trust | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $116,716 |
124 | Dennis D Muller | Defiance, IA 51527 | $116,526 |
125 | Ken Nielsen | Harlan, IA 51537 | $115,813 |
126 | Arnold Gude Rev Trust | Elk Horn, IA 51531 | $115,797 |
127 | Luke Francis Croghan | Manilla, IA 51454 | $114,254 |
128 | Behrend LLC | Walnut, IA 51577 | $113,699 |
129 | Marvin G Kohles | Lenexa, KS 66227 | $113,585 |
130 | Thomas M Sullivan | Dunlap, IA 51529 | $112,798 |
131 | Myron Sorensen Rev Trust | Harlan, IA 51537 | $112,292 |
132 | Henry L Walter | Elk Horn, IA 51531 | $110,699 |
133 | Mardell M Walter Rev Trust | Elk Horn, IA 51531 | $110,201 |
134 | Ralph Schwery | Panama, IA 51562 | $108,898 |
135 | Scott A Mclaughlin | Defiance, IA 51527 | $107,990 |
136 | Keast Farms LLC | Oakland, IA 51560 | $107,877 |
137 | Grace E Pauley | Panama, IA 51562 | $106,090 |
138 | Jeff Schaben | Earling, IA 51530 | $102,538 |
139 | Gene C Borkowski Trust | Irwin, IA 51446 | $102,508 |
140 | Paulee Ltd | Neola, IA 51559 | $102,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”