Conservation Reserve Program in Sioux County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,619
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sioux County, Iowa totaled $39,626,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mark J Swets | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $142,619 |
62 | James Westra | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $141,796 |
63 | Douglas Moret | Hull, IA 51239 | $141,733 |
64 | Anita D Vogel | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $140,552 |
65 | Floyd Valley Farms LLC | Alton, IA 51003 | $138,007 |
66 | Sgt & Fritz Farms LLC | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $137,004 |
67 | Merle D Solberg Trust | Hudson, SD 57034 | $135,772 |
68 | Florence Osterkamp | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $135,660 |
69 | Albert Groeneweg | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $133,149 |
70 | Ron S Klemme | Sioux City, IA 51101 | $130,565 |
71 | Mld Farms Inc | Orange City, IA 51041 | $129,229 |
72 | Northwest Iowa Regional Water | Hospers, IA 51238 | $127,835 |
73 | Van Driessen Farms Inc | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $127,661 |
74 | Hofmeyer Farms Inc | Sheldon, IA 51201 | $126,806 |
75 | Jerry N Diekevers | Hospers, IA 51238 | $126,217 |
76 | W & A Enterprises Inc | Maurice, IA 51036 | $123,085 |
77 | Beth Sipma | Sheldon, IA 51201 | $121,194 |
78 | Merle D Solberg Trust | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $117,714 |
79 | Lesharon Kay Osterkamp | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $116,992 |
80 | Peter I Noteboom Revocable Trust | Orange City, IA 51041 | $114,292 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”