Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Sioux County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 281
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Sioux County, Iowa totaled $5,314,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Bomgaars Farms Inc | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $15,074 |
122 | Verlyn G Zwart | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $15,073 |
123 | Dennis Dale Van Sloten | Hull, IA 51239 | $14,865 |
124 | George S Allan Trust | Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301 | $14,782 |
125 | Tim R Kooima | Hull, IA 51239 | $14,774 |
126 | Dennis M Koob | Granville, IA 51022 | $14,400 |
127 | Thomas Vande Pol | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $14,261 |
128 | Steven Eugene Vermeer | Boyden, IA 51234 | $14,219 |
129 | William B Koops | Hull, IA 51239 | $14,056 |
130 | Dykstra Farms Inc | Hospers, IA 51238 | $14,030 |
131 | Flatland Farm Inc | Hull, IA 51239 | $14,000 |
132 | Kevin L Boeve | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $13,915 |
133 | Y-do-i Farm Inc | Inwood, IA 51240 | $13,860 |
134 | Wilmer J Hulstein Rev Trust | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $13,566 |
135 | Scott A Gray | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $13,566 |
136 | Milton Pennings | Orange City, IA 51041 | $13,285 |
137 | Matthew B Kooima | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $13,119 |
138 | Dave K Huitink | Orange City, IA 51041 | $12,601 |
139 | Terry Kooima | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $12,582 |
140 | Lyle Schroeder | Granville, IA 51022 | $12,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”