Conservation Reserve Program in Taylor County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,818
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Taylor County, Iowa totaled $159,244,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Oak Hill Farms Inc | Lees Summit, MO 64081 | $369,861 |
82 | Jackie Lee Spencer | Bedford, IA 50833 | $368,323 |
83 | Glenn Bauer Irrevocable Trust | Lenox, IA 50851 | $367,147 |
84 | Donna James | Plainfield, IN 46168 | $366,233 |
85 | Terry Henson | Blockton, IA 50836 | $361,345 |
86 | Kenneth D Sleep | Bedford, IA 50833 | $360,073 |
87 | Paul B Beemer | Maryville, MO 64468 | $359,643 |
88 | Michael D Sullivan | Braddyville, IA 51631 | $358,872 |
89 | Morgan J Scott | Rocheport, MO 65279 | $356,778 |
90 | Irene Elizabeth Schmitz Tobin Rev Living Trust | Ames, IA 50014 | $355,401 |
91 | Terry Lee Lundquist | Corning, IA 50841 | $353,604 |
92 | Deer Trail Farms | Sunrise Beach, MO 65079 | $351,172 |
93 | Diana May Hangman | Las Vegas, NV 89178 | $347,265 |
94 | B & F Farm LLC | Kellerton, IA 50133 | $346,224 |
95 | David Eich Trust-david Eich | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304 | $344,887 |
96 | Anderson Living Trust | Creston, IA 50801 | $344,645 |
97 | Gayle Sammons | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $343,892 |
98 | Kevin Robert Neal | Nodaway, IA 50857 | $342,429 |
99 | Connie Cooper | Bedford, IA 50833 | $340,652 |
100 | Michael A Jacklin | Hartford, WI 53027 | $336,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”